Victory in survival: Will Hamas choose the Kurdish option?

Although Kurds have yet to achieve statehood, this doesn't mean they never will. One critical component still exists to perhaps have a state one day: the continued existence of the Kurdish people.

Victory in survival: Will Hamas choose the Kurdish option?

Half a century ago, the Algiers Agreement was reached between Iraq and Iran, which ended the latter's support for the Kurdish nationalist movement led by Mullah Mustafa Barzani in Iraq.

At the time, Barzani was faced with two difficult choices: to cease armed struggle and leave Kurdistan with tens of thousands of his fighters and their families or to persevere in a geopolitical landscape devoid of clear support and alliances.

The withdrawal of Iranian support, orchestrated by the United States, coincided with the strengthening of the Iraqi army, bolstered by a strategic treaty with the Soviet Union. This development heralded an impending massacre that threatened the very fabric of Kurdish society and geography and even the survival of Kurdish demographics.

After a 14-year revolution, Barzani drank the "poison of betrayal" (author's phrasing) to spare his people from further bloodshed. He chose self-defeat over resistance.

In Iran, where he was exiled, Barzani died a broken man. Renowned Egyptian journalist Mohamed Hassanein Heikala, who interviewed him in Tehran, called him a "wounded eagle."

Victory in survival

Although politically isolated, the Kurdish nationalist movement persisted over the course of a century. Pragmatism and survival became a cornerstone of Kurdish resistance, even if it meant military and political capitulation.

Before Barzani, Sheikh Mahmoud al-Hafid, in the early 20th century, had also capitulated to the British occupation of Iraq.

Similarly, Sheikh Said Piran in Turkey in the mid-1920s, Judge Muhammad in the mid-1940s with the Iranian authority following the collapse of the Kurdistan Republic in the city of Mahabad, and the Kurdistan Workers' Party experienced a relative surrender and a radical shift in its strategy and demands after the late 20th-century arrest of its leader, Abdullah Öcalan.

Pragmatism and survival became a cornerstone of Kurdish resistance, even if it meant military and political capitulation.

In Syria, Kurdish parties spent an entire century appeasing various ruling totalitarian authorities to survive. Kurds and their political forces that are most closely tied to their cause know very well that not all resistance is through military actions.

Although Kurds have yet to achieve statehood, this doesn't mean they never will. One critical component still exists to perhaps have a state one day: the continued existence of the Kurdish people.

'The Kurdish Option'

Across decades, the Palestinian struggle for liberation has opted for what has come to be known as 'The Kurdish Option' on several occasions. It did so when its fighters exited Jordan in 1970, thanks to the pragmatism of PLO leader Yasser Arafat at the time.

In 1982, this same pragmatism was practised when Palestinian fighters exited Beirut instead of risking their decimation and the possible decimation of Beirut and their Lebanese allies.

However, these surrenders came with political consequences. After decades of failed military resistance, the PLO reluctantly signed on to the Oslo Accords, accepting the bare minimum.

For its part, Hamas faces a similarly difficult choice between its own survival and the survival of the Palestinian people. With nearly 40,000 Palestinians already killed and the majority of Gaza destroyed or damaged by Israel's brutal offensive, the price Palestinians have paid dearly for Hamas's actions.

Will the group push on with its fight or choose the 'Kurdish option' to ensure Palestinians can live to fight another day?

font change