When does voluntary exodus from Gaza amount to forced displacement?

Thousands of people who fled their homes are living in camps, creating fears of another Nakba as Israel continues its war on Gaza

When does voluntary exodus from Gaza amount to forced displacement?

If by "displacement" we mean tens or even hundreds of thousands of people fleeing from Gaza to the Egyptian Sinai overnight, then this has not yet occurred.

However, if the term refers to the more gradual relocation of that many people within Gaza – and the voluntary emigration of thousands abroad – amid ongoing raids, destruction, and hardship, then displacement is indeed taking place.

Benjamin Netanyahu's government reportedly has plans to displace as many Palestinians as possible from both the Gaza and the West Bank. Some members of his government have openly referred to this conflict as the "Second War of Independence".

At the same time, the Palestinians are acutely aware of the potential for a second or third Nakba, reminiscent of the mass displacements of 1948 and 1967. They firmly reject this scenario.

Egypt has set a firm red line against accepting Palestinians in Sinai, wary that such a move could reignite extremism, especially after its recent efforts to eliminate the Islamic State (IS).

Read more: Why Egypt rejects a Palestinian population transfer from Gaza

It has even implied force could be used to prevent such a large-scale migration, citing a threat to national security. It has, so far, resisted US and Western pressure to accept such a population transfer. Jordan has adopted a similar stance over the West Bank.

Palestinians are acutely aware of the potential for a second or third Nakba, reminiscent of the mass displacements of 1948 and 1967. They firmly reject this scenario.

UNRWA rejects new Nakba

Additionally, the United Nations, through the International Relief and Works Agency for Refugees (UNRWA), has openly rejected to be involved in any plan that displaces Palestinians within or outside the Gaza Strip to avoid complicity in any new Nakba.

Nonetheless, as Israel's war continues, a form of social engineering is actively unfolding both inside and outside Gaza, signalling that displacement is indeed occurring.

Here are some key numbers:

Approximately 1.9 million out of 2.3 million inhabitants have been displaced from the northern to the southern part of the Gaza Strip. It's estimated that only about 300,000 remain in the north. Although the latter number might be an overestimation, it is also gradually decreasing due to Israeli strikes, the deteriorating living conditions in the north, and the shifting focus of international agencies to the south.

Egypt has established a camp in the Al-Mawasi area near Rafah. Initially featuring 200 tents, there are plans to expand it to accommodate around 20,000 people, with further expansions or additional camps near the Egyptian border under consideration. Some Western organisations experienced in setting up camps in northern Syria and near the Turkish border have started operations near the Gaza border.

Palestinians in Gaza are increasingly contacting relatives abroad to secure immigration visas and relocate to Western countries. Countries like Canada have begun easing visa processes and family reunification requests for those from Gaza.

Preliminary estimates suggest that around 200,000 people may relocate or migrate in the current circumstances. Should the conflict persist or reconstruction efforts face delays, this number is expected to increase via family unification abroad, as observed in previous conflicts.

Israel reportedly intends to create a buffer zone in the northern part of Gaza, which would involve depopulating the area. There are also plans to implement selective criteria for allowing residents to return north. Moreover, the focus of UN agencies, especially UNRWA, is shifting towards the south, indicating that for various reasons, the return of Gazans to the northern region will likely be challenging.

Between 70% and 80% of the northern region has been destroyed, further complicating the possibility of Gazans returning.

Donor countries and organisations will play a crucial role in the upcoming phase. By directing funding, these entities will effectively dictate their agendas in the Strip, determining geographical areas for funding or relief priorities.

This influence may lead to the transformation of temporary camps into permanent settlements, a common occurrence in this part of the world where the temporary often becomes permanent.

Between 70% and 80% of the northern region has been destroyed, further complicating the possibility of Gazans returning.

Agencies' focus moves south

Currently, the focus of international institutions appears to be on the southern and central regions of the Gaza Strip, potentially leading to the institutionalisation of Palestinian presence there over time. Monitoring the roles of key figures like American envoy David Satterfield, UN envoy Ms. Sigrid Kaag and Tony Blair will be crucial.

Israel has indicated that it will continue its military operations for a few weeks before transitioning to a second phase. Hamas vows to resist until Netanyahu's plans are thwarted, dismissing any post war plans that exclude them as mere illusions.

Initially, the Palestinian Authority expressed reluctance to return to Gaza under the circumstances of war, but later said it could come back in the broader context of a "two-state solution" — a concept not currently prominent on the international agenda.

There is no clear scenario for the 'day after', with Western and Arab nations divided over potential future outcomes.

Whatever happens next, many Palestinians may want to leave Gaza amid hopelessness, conflicting agendas, deepening divisions, escalating human suffering, and continuous violence.

This sentiment will significantly influence the future trends in displacement and migration. Nevertheless, there is a political commitment to prevent a "second Nakba," echoing across the region and the world.

font change