From the Black Sea to Syria, Russian provocation of US troops intensifies

Collision of Russian fighter jet and US drone over the Black Sea highlights the dangers of a miscalculation leading to escalation between Russia and Nato

From the Black Sea to Syria, Russian provocation of US troops intensifies

The recent spike in aggressive behaviour from the Russian Air Force over Syria, coupled with the collision between a Russian fighter jet and a US Reaper drone in the Black Sea, suggests that tensions between the two countries have reached alarming levels.

While scuffles and standoffs between their forces in northeast Syria are not new, the recent developments have sparked concerns about the potential for an escalation in confrontation between the two sides. The deconfliction protocols between those troops need to be urgently reactivated to prevent the situation from spiralling out of control.

The US and Russian militaries have operated in an uneasy coexistence in Syria since the Kremlin sent forces there in 2015 to support the Syrian regime.

As for US troops, they were deployed to north-eastern Syria in 2014 to counter the Islamic State terrorist group in cooperation with the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces. Around 900 soldiers and service members are still stationed in the country to help keep a potential resurgence of the militant group at bay.

Notably, the US and Russia set up communication channels in 2015 to prevent any clashes between each other in Syria.

Provocative behaviour

However, the US forces have reportedly witnessed a significant increase in provacative behaviour by Russia's air force in Syria since 1 March. US military officials cited flights by armed Russian warplanes over US bases in the south-east and north-east of Syria as an example of the ongoing harassment of US forces in the region.

The officials also pointed out that Russian aircraft have become emboldened to act aggressively toward US bases in a manner not typical of an organised military force.

According to the commander of Air Forces Central, Lt. Gen. Alexus G. Grynkewich, Russia’s more aggressive posture appears to stem from the arrival of Russian commanders who had been involved in Moscow’s troubled invasion of Ukraine and are trying to make up for their poor performance there.

Russia's more aggressive posture appears to stem from the arrival of Russian commanders who had been involved in Moscow's troubled invasion of Ukraine and are trying to make up for their poor performance there.

"To me, it's very, very concerning. I believe that some of those Russian leaders are trying to rebuild their reputation."

The behaviour of Russian military aircraft has become a major concern for US defence officials after a Russian fighter jet harassed a US drone on March 10th. The Russian Su-27 fighter jet collided with a US Reaper drone over international waters west of Crimea, causing it to crash into the Black Sea.

The US criticised the Russian pilots' "unsafe and unprofessional" interception and accused them of attempting to disrupt the US aircraft before the collision.

According to the US statement, Russian fighters dumped fuel and flew recklessly in front of the drone, leading to the propeller being struck. On its part, the Russian Ministry of Defence claimed that the US drone flights off the coast of Crimea were "provocative in nature" while denying any wrongdoing.

Crimea is a Ukrainian peninsula that Russia annexed in 2014 and now uses as a major military base for its war on Ukraine.

Read more: Crimea attacked as Tatars prepare to retake their homeland

Potential for greater escalation

The incident highlights the dangers of a mistake or miscalculation leading to escalation between Russia and Nato, particularly as military hardware around Ukraine continues to increase.

Although the drone incident was serious, the situation in Syria presents greater risks. According to US officials, Russian forces in Syria are not currently informing them about their movements as they have done in the past.

That violates the existing deconfliction protocols, which require the air force that flies into areas controlled by the other party to inform them in advance to avoid collisions.

Russian forces in Syria are not currently informing them about their movements as they have done in the past. That violates the existing deconfliction protocols, which require the air force that flies into areas controlled by the other party to inform them in advance to avoid collisions.

Therefore, when unannounced Russian aircraft enter what the US regards as its airspace, American warplanes now intercept them. US officials argue that they are obliged to closely monitor Russian aircraft movements in their airspace to ensure the safety of their forces on the ground and prevent any potential threats.

Regardless of the justification, there are currently no clear procedures to prevent what happened in the Black Sea from being repeated in Syria, which would likely be seen by the US as a deliberate act.

Read more: Syria: A microcosm of global polarisation

Miscalculations can lead to grave mistakes

Unfortunately, recent developments indicate that such a scenario is no longer a remote possibility. In times of crisis, even the slightest misunderstanding can lead to miscalculations and grave mistakes.

While relying on wise people in times of crisis can prevent catastrophic outcomes, this approach is not a foolproof strategy. To mitigate the risks of escalation in Syria, there is an urgent need for clear and deconflicting protocols between the US and Russian forces.

Meanwhile, the established military hotline between those forces must be fully utilised to prevent unintended incidents, which could quickly escalate into a disaster.

font change