Economic and environmental devastation is all around us

The world is facing unprecedented crises including wars, inflation, climate change, rising energy costs and food insecurity

Eduardo Ramon

Economic and environmental devastation is all around us

The world is at war.  The climate crisis is an epidemic of economic enormities.  A crisis that now — in this post-truth, polarised and populist world — still divides opinion and is driving economic upheaval to an extent not seen for nearly a century.   

While we have droughts in Europe and North America, we see devastation wrought by flooding across much of Pakistan.  Alongside this, the distinct possibilities of runaway inflation and economic stagnation brought about by resource scarcity and socio-economic protectionism, is creating a poisonous concoction that could lead the globe to a deadly reset on several fronts. 

In a world where economic and physical wars are adding fuel to already raging fires, the security of our energy, food and water has never been at greater risk.  Two of these areas are now leading to inflationary pressure and leading central banks have taken significant measures to try to bring it back in line.  

These measures bring home the impact of climate change on our daily lives.   

The UK has already seen inflation reach more than 9% in the last quarter of 2022, with forecasts from Citibank recently predicting the Consumer Price Index will hit 18% in the first quarter of 2021, with the Retail Price Index set to reach 21%.   

The US, not far behind, at least has something of a functioning government and President Biden’s latest piece of legislation, the Inflation Reduction Act — which was a feat in itself to get passed — looks like it will help to get on top of inflation and bring it down in the short-term. 

These upward inflationary pressures are being driven mostly by increased energy and food costs and while some of that is a fallout from Covid-19, it is undeniable that the warning signs of the impact of climate change on rising prices has been largely ignored for far too long. 

Food security 
The dangers posed to food security by climate change have been apparent for years. Even before the pandemic and economic protectionism made matters worse, the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change made it clear that the impact would be negative and unpredictable but also inequitably distributed globally.  

Maize and wheat yields had already taken a hit worldwide before the war in Ukraine drove down global stock levels.  

As per the UN’s Academic Impact (UNAI) 'Food Security and Climate Change' series, with nearly 950 million metric tonnes of maize and nearly 700 million metric tonnes of wheat consumed globally every year, wheat consumption alone represents over 20% of the world’s calories and protein.   

The loss of suitable cropland due to climate change is expected to lead to significant deterioration of these two key crops, alongside other impacts, including the abiotic stresses caused by the unpredictability of heat and weather patterns and water supply and the biotic stresses of changes in insect life.   

Expected declines in South America of 9-19% of maize production by 2050 are eclipsed by an expected decline of 33% in countries like Tanzania. The predicted drop in wheat production is even more severe with forecasts of between 44% and 49% in regions such as South Asia. 

Of course, this is somewhat eclipsed by the fact that both Ukraine and Russia play such a pivotal role in the provision of critical food stocks globally.  They account for 30% of the world’s wheat, 60% of the world’s sunflower oil and roughly one-fifth of the world’s maize, according to the "Global Impact of war in Ukraine on food, energy and finance systems”, published in April of last year by the United Nations.  

The decline of fertiliser supplies from these two nations — combined with searing heatwaves and low rainfall caused by climate change — has meant a significant hit for harvests across the EU and US, following poor yield in Brazil earlier this year. 

Such a drop in supply yields inevitable inflationary consequences. While the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization’s Food Price Index continues to drop, it remains 7.9% above its value a year ago.  It also masks food inflation rates seen by many of the poorest countries around the world.  

At the top of that list, Zimbabwe, Lebanon and Venezuela are among 36 countries with reported food inflation rates of over 20%, alongside Cyprus, Argentina and Hungary.  The EU was averaging 12.8% in July also, while the UN has recently reported a “bleak economic outlook posing serious strains for global food security.” 

That leads to the second inevitable impact on supply, and the need to maintain sufficient sustenance to stave off malnutrition in many countries.   

In the words of the World Bank’s August 2022 Food Security Update: “Record high food prices have triggered a global crisis that will drive millions more into extreme poverty, magnifying hunger and malnutrition, while threatening to erase hard-won gains in development.”  

Record high food prices have triggered a global crisis that will drive millions more into extreme poverty, magnifying hunger and malnutrition, while threatening to erase hard-won gains in development.

World Bank Food Security Update

Action Against Hunger identifies climate change as a determining factor behind the rise of world hunger. It says the number of undernourished people has grown by 150 million over the last three years. 

In the face of this most pressing of challenges, political and economic leaders must respond or face inevitable uprisings, as we have already started to see around the world.  And today, just as it was for Marie Antoinette, a response similar to qu'ils mangent de la brioche will undoubtedly increase the likelihood of people being removed from positions of power. 

Energy crisis
Energy supplies are also unquestionably more vulnerable because the realities of climate change were not dealt with early enough, creating the second great source of economic fallout. Upward inflationary pressure, without government controls, is likely to push millions around the world into absolute poverty and the difficult choice between heating and eating this winter. 

Britain’s war-time prime minister, Winston Churchill, once said, “those who fail to learn from history, are doomed to repeat it.”  With global energy supplies, the warning signs have been known for decades.  Several incidents took place that incentivised a shift towards renewable energy, but unfortunately it did not achieve a longer lasting global response. 

Most of our energy still comes from non-renewable finite sources.  Decades ago, that might have been someone else’s problem. But now the time has come for us to be the generation that must worry about it. 

A failure by most countries to move to local, renewable energy supplies has left many facing the distinct possibilities of blackouts this winter.  Germany has been most obviously hit after Russia’s decision to cut off gas supplies via the Nord Stream 1 gas pipeline. 

This followed Berlin’s previous commitment to switch off nuclear power and move to renewables, meaning immediate action was required to minimise the threat of potential blackouts and power rationing — a phenomenon sadly all too well known, over several years, in other parts of the world.   

As recently as 2021, Russia supplied 55% of Germany’s gas imports (World Economic Forum, August 2022), which had already more than halved by June 2022.  

And while the obvious solution is to plough on with proposals to become more reliant on green energy, in the short term, the Germans, like many, face immediate pressure from their people and businesses for reliable sources of energy amid hyper inflationary increases in fuel costs. 

The need to sit on stocks of gas supplies to get through the winter is causing self-perpetuating spirals in inflation — even after the Germans had already made moves in April to move closer to renewable energy prominence.  

Robert Habeck, Germany’s Vice Chancellor, told reporters: "On the one hand, the climate crisis is coming to a head. On the other hand, Russia's invasion shows how important it is to phase out fossil fuels and promote the expansion of renewables." 

On the one hand, the climate crisis is coming to a head. On the other hand, Russia's invasion shows how important it is to phase out fossil fuels and promote the expansion of renewables.

Robert Habeck, Germany’s Vice Chancellor

Reforms sought to more than double Germany’s green energy use from 40% to 100% by 2035, up from a previous target of 65%. Proposals, such as increases in offshore wind production, were set to provide the equivalent capacity of 10 nuclear plants by 2030.   

But in the meantime, the country is looking to traditional energy sources for salvation. Stress tests are being carried out on the state’s three nuclear reactors, which provide the country with 6% of its energy, and a law has been passed to bring back coal and oil-fired power plants as a reserve measure. 

The spree to buy alternative sources of Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) for storage has added to inflation — not only on consumers and businesses in Europe and North America, but globally. 

Countries like Pakistan — who were tied into contracts for the supply of LNG at reasonable rates — were already facing the consequences of defaulting suppliers and having to purchase at far higher spot rates. 

If anyone thinks this is only happening because of the fall-out of Russia’s war in Ukraine, they are wrong.  Energy security concerns have long existed because of climate change.   

In October 2021, the International Energy Agency commented on what were then record highs of gas, coal and electricity prices, saying: “governments have not been pursuing strong enough policies to scale up clean energy sources and technologies to fill the gap [of oil and natural gas].” 

Energy cost increases are a major contributing factor to inflation in every corner of the world.  No nation is immune.  Significant fiscal measures are being taken to reduce the burden on households and businesses, where governments can afford to introduce some form of price control measures or subsidies.   

But while this is an absolute necessity to stave off starvation, it is all too likely to divert money away from long-term investment in renewable energy sources that could be our salvation in the years to come.   

Without fiscal and monetary controls in place — which themselves will bite even harder in the next year or two — we will see inflation potentially spiralling as employees seek to match the increases in costs by demanding higher salaries.   

Without fiscal and monetary controls in place — which themselves will bite even harder in the next year or two — we will see inflation potentially spiralling as employees seek to match the increases in costs by demanding higher salaries.  

Businesses will face the burden of impossibly high costs for materials, trading, energy and labour, which could cause further delays in global supply, and even gaps, which could cause even further cost increases. 

Call to action 
The International Monetary Fund raised its inflation forecast in its World Economic Outlook publication in July due to food and energy costs, to almost 10% in developing economies.  

 

It predicted that the disinflationary monetary policies of central banks would help limit global growth to just 2.9%, with, “a plausible alternative scenario in which risks materialise, inflation rises further, and global growth declines to about 2.6% and 2% in 2022 and 2023, respectively,” which the IMF states would, “put growth in the bottom 10% of outcomes since 1970.” 

But like all wars, they end.  And economically, they have been catalysts for economic transformation.   

Politically, there is a need for a reset from the post-truth, polarised and populist world that we have become — one where just half the world sees the desperate need to work as one with our planet or face economic and environmental devastation. 

There is hope, however.  

If the globe can respond positively and enterprisingly, we could ensure that growth can be fuelled not by fossil fuels but by renewables. We could move from intensive to sustainable farming and towards a future where we treat water as the most critically precious resource we have for the sustainment of life on our planet.   

Political leaders have always sought to continue to grow economies, but at what cost?   

A greener outlook on economic management as part of this reset is absolutely needed to ensure we learn from the mistakes of our past and provide the sustainable growth which people around the world both deserve and desire. 

font change