The intellectual odyssey of JD Vance

Judging by a recent podcast, the US Vice President has been doing some serious thinking

Recent comments from US Vice-President JD Vance suggest a new line of thinking perhaps more in tune with the American mood.
Al Majalla
Recent comments from US Vice-President JD Vance suggest a new line of thinking perhaps more in tune with the American mood.

The intellectual odyssey of JD Vance

It has never been easy for JD Vance to have an impact on public consciousness. Back in the dying days of Joe Biden’s presidency, Donald Trump’s followers were bewildered by his choice of running mate. Vance, still only 41, was then a relative unknown beyond those who had read his book on his ‘hillbilly’ upbringing, in which he diagnosed the woes of America’s rust belt.

Ever since being picked and catapulted into national consciousness, Vance has tried to make an impact, but has often come across as querulous, notoriously accusing Ukraine’s president of ingratitude during a White House visit in front of the world’s cameras and scolding the Europeans in the heart of Europe for their failure to uphold free speech, a charge that stumped almost everyone in the room. A recent convert to Catholicism, Vance has taken issue with not one pope but two.

Uncomfortable with public speaking, Vance has had to swim against the riptide of his charismatic boss in the battle to be noticed, with his own jokes often falling flat, but compared with previous vice presidents he has had a pivotal role, not least in diplomatic efforts to resolve a war with Iran that he was never in favour of starting.

Saul Loeb/AFP
US Vice President JD Vance looks on as President Donald Trump meets Lebanese President Joseph Aoun in the Oval Office on July 21, 2026.

As might be expected, his thinking has evolved since the campaign in 2024 and him subsequently taking up the job in January 2025. How? The latest clues came from a podcast conversation with American commentator and media personality Joe Rogan, one that lasts almost as long as Christopher Nolan’s epic The Odyssey and involves easily as many twists and turns.

Tracing an evolution

Along with the variety of topics covered, there are distinct changes in tone, from the casual to the earnestly wonkish. Rogan and Vance are from the same ideological stable, so there is no verbal duelling, and some early casual chat. On a cage fight they both saw on the White House lawn, Vance—a Yale man—says: “It was pretty sick, it was very cool,” the glib style threatening to undermine the dignity of his office.

Elsewhere, Vance says: “There’s a real populism that I’m very much a fan of because I think you should be responsive to people. But there’s like a faux populism of the way that I’m going to appeal to people is by assuming that they’re idiots and acting like they’re idiots.” Another dangerous moment comes when Rogan complains that “social media has ruined discourse in a lot of ways.” Vance agrees, which is a curious position for a man with so many friends in Silicon Valley, and whose boss comments on just about everything using social media (and not always with strict presidential decorum).

Jacquelyn Martin/Reuters
US Vice President JD Vance arriving for talks with Iranian officials in Islamabad, Pakistan, on 11 April 2026.

For large passages of the podcast interview, Vance seems happy to borrow another discursive trick from the Oval Office—a sort of rambling stream of consciousness. This gives us a long and mostly uninformative excursion into the Epstein files (he vows to look at them for evidence of UFOs) and a quasi-theological digression on the nature of alien lifeforms and their resemblance to demons.

Aliens aside, it becomes clear around halfway through that something fundamental has changed in Vance’s outlook. Conservative sermonising has given way to a softer, more open-minded approach. On religious matters, for example, we hear that putting the Ten Commandments up in every classroom may not be the best idea. At the same time, he would not be troubled by quotes from the Quran in their place. He says freedom of religion is not a liberal invention, and was “originally derived from a Christian idea about free will and the dignity of the person”.

Maturing views

Vance is shocked to hear that soldiers serving in the Middle East have been told they are engaged in a Holy War. For a man who has just written a book about his Catholic faith, he has none of the blood-curdling ferocity of his colleague, Pete Hegseth. He disavows the apocalyptic worldview and rejects the hawkish position of his predecessor, Mike Pence. His involvement in Middle East diplomacy seems to have convinced him that the war must be resolved through a deal, possibly even stretching to investment in Iran by the Gulf states. Such views show maturity.

Something fundamental has changed in Vance's outlook. Conservative sermonising has given way to a softer, more open-minded approach

When we learn that Vance is fearful of the temptation—especially among the young—to espouse democratic socialism, this is not the ideologue speaking. Indeed, by this point, he seems chastened by the realities of politics. He even warns his fellow Republicans that wealth inequality, and the loss of confidence among ordinary people, will lead to socialism. "The main issue, if you go back to the Industrial Revolution, is that there was a lot of demand for workers," he says. "But the inequality in the country got completely out of whack." The resulting era of the "robber barons" in the West "led to fascism… it led to communism".

Likewise, on the disaffection of the young, he has considered views. "Unless you go down that pathway of allowing young Americans to own something, socialism is the inevitable outcome," he warns.

Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images via AFP
Senator JD Vance at an event on 21 July 2024, when he was the Republican vice presidential candidate.

"Do I think that's good? No. But I really do worry—and I see this frankly more in my own party than I do on the other side—there is this revulsion to socialism that's totally justified without enough thinking about 'how did we get here in the first place'. And if— man, if we don't fix that, and I would say if we don't get back to a more Christian sort of understanding of economics, socialism is the alternative."

Giving workers a say

He quotes the slain conservative commentator Charlie Kirk in support of this view and traces his own understanding of how Christianity might mitigate the effects of inequality back to an encyclical by one of the Pope Leos, concerning AI.

Issued in the 19th century, Vance calls it "one of the best things… ever been written by a Christian leader," explaining that "the basic argument of it is that in the age of industrial churn, there has to be a middle way between 6-year-olds working on the factory floor and socialism. Part of that solution is to give workers a sort of say in what's going on. Give normal people some power in this system."

Distilled, this is an argument for unionism. In response to AI, he also proposes to counter its "hyper-monopolist" tendencies. For a figure on the right of American politics and the representative of Silicon Valley, this sounds like a work in progress. It could even amount to a quiet revolution.

font change