Why South Yemen secession isn't a real possibility

No single party in Yemen can can impose dominance over the other through military force, nor can any side achieve dominance solely by relying on external actors

A crowd of people at a march organized by the Southern Transitional Council in Aden, Yemen, on 21 December 2025.
Reuters
A crowd of people at a march organized by the Southern Transitional Council in Aden, Yemen, on 21 December 2025.

Why South Yemen secession isn't a real possibility

For three weeks, speculation has been rife about the potential secession of southern Yemen from the North after fighters aligned with the Southern Transitional Council (STC) took control of the eastern governorates of Hadramout and Al Mahrah, triggering a wave of commentary in Arab and international media, with analysts offering competing visions of Yemen’s political future. Some assume that the South's return to independence is imminent and that a major geopolitical transformation is already underway.

More than three decades after the achievement of unity, despite the developmental progress this brought, the union remains a source of discomfort and dissatisfaction for many in the South. Some in the North share this sentiment, resenting the focus on rehabilitating the South when their own areas had also been neglected. Although most levers of government fell under northern control, Southerners were accused of exploiting political circumstances to secure preferential treatment.

Entering 2026, there is no longer any dispute that Yemen’s unity faces immense challenges, both internal and external. Today, Yemen exists in neither war nor peace. That must be resolved before the state can be restored and serious consideration be given to the country's future. To many Yemenis experiencing severe hardship, the present military and political chaos alongside extreme poverty appears more dire than secession, but secession is neither the best nor the only solution to Yemen’s complex and deep-rooted problems.

Panoramic view

North Yemen is smaller than South Yemen, but the South is home to approximately 5 million people, compared with more than 30 million in the North. The population there is predominantly tribal, impoverished, and heavily armed. There is a scarcity of agricultural land, modest natural resources, and high fertility rates, while the South is richer in natural resources and less densely populated, particularly in its eastern and central regions.

The main issue is not so much the disparity between the North and South as the failure to achieve genuine integration in the early 1990s. Wars, violence, political crises, and economic upheaval have plagued the country throughout its 35 years of union. Yet despite the hardships it has brought, Yemen’s political system has survived. As a result, unity has not fulfilled the aspirations and hopes of the Yemeni people, so grievances have mounted. Many Yemenis feel frustrated and marginalised.

Such grievances led to the mass ‘Arab Spring’ protests in Yemen in 2011, which ultimately led to the collapse of the regime and the resignation of the long-running ruler, President Ali Abdullah Saleh, who was instrumental in facilitating unity 20 years earlier. After Saleh was eventually deposed in 2012, the state began to disintegrate as power fell into the hands of the Iran-backed Houthis. Yemen’s unity slowly unravelled, with the STC increasingly backed by external actors.

Reuters
The second session of the National Dialogue Conference was held in Sana'a on 20 March 2013.

A UN-sponsored National Dialogue Conference ran from March 2013 to January 2014, at which the grievances and suffering of Saada governorate (in Yemen’s north-west, where the Houthis originate) were acknowledged as having been experienced during several domestic wars. Likewise, it was acknowledged that the South had suffered damage and loss as a result of the 1994 war (between North and South).

This was meant to contribute towards reconciliation pending a transition, but in August 2014, the Houthis mobilised protests in the capital Sanaa, angered at the government’s removal of fuel subsidies. In September, armed Houthi fighters stormed the capital, with no intervention from the Yemeni army. In January, the militia stormed the presidential palace, forcing the president, prime minister, and cabinet to resign.

The STC was set up with backing from the United Arab Emirates in 2017, and its activities later came to be seen as a second blow to what remained of Yemeni unity, carried out under the banner of purging the southern governorates of extremist terrorist groups. In January 2018, forces loyal to the STC captured government buildings in Aden (the capital of South Yemen until the 1990 unification).

In September 2025, the STC (which is vehemently opposed to the Houthis) called for a “two-state solution” in Yemen. On 2 December 2025, STC forces launched a military operation, and by 8 December, they had captured most of the territory of the former South Yemen state, including the oil-rich governorate of Hadramout. In the days that followed, STC leaders announced that they would begin preparing to establish a new state, South Arabia.

AFP
A march in Khormaksar Square in the coastal city of Aden, in support of the Southern Transitional Council, during which a picture of the council's leader, Aidarus al-Zubaidi, was raised on 14 December 2025.

Obstacles to secession

At present, any attempt at secession faces significant obstacles, not least because the country remains mired in a state of war and fragmentation, in which no party can impose dominance over the other through military force, nor can any side achieve dominance solely by relying on external support.

Furthermore, the prospect of secession lacks a broad consensus among the southern population. Nowhere is this more evident than in the key eastern and central governorates of Shabwa and Abyan, which do not align with the STC (the Council's leadership is mainly drawn from tribes from Al-Dhalea, Yafa, and Radfan, which have a history of hostility with Shabwa and Abyan). As such, no Yemeni party has a popular mandate to undermine Yemen’s unity. Even if several could mobilise a few thousand supporters for their cause, cleaving the state in two would require a referendum.

The prospect of secession lacks a broad consensus among the southern population

While it is true that unity cannot be enforced through force, secession cannot be imposed by force either. In international law, Yemen remains a sovereign state and a member of the United Nations and other international bodies. It maintains treaties and border agreements with its neighbours that cannot simply be disregarded. It would require the consent of the other party to the union, namely, the internationally recognised government, of which the STC claims to be a part.

For Yemeni legitimacy, the priority is still ending the war, after which political disputes can be settled. There is no current appetite for new states in the developing world, particularly in such a strategic and geopolitically sensitive region, where attempts to redraw Yemen's political map by force and without a broad national consensus would endanger the security of the Arab Gulf states. Saudi Arabia maintains deep social, tribal, political, and economic ties with Yemen as a whole, and particularly with its eastern governorates.

Any reversion to two states threatens to take Yemen back decades, to a time when there were two distinct political systems in the two halves of the country: a liberal-leaning system in the North and a Marxist-Socialist system in the South. Yemenis learned then how difficult it was to have two states for one people, with any political problem in one half quickly becoming political capital for the other. Those who faced repression in one part would seek refuge in the other. 

Getty
Aerial view of Houthi recruits take part in a military parade held by the movement, on 15 September 2022 in Sana'a, Yemen.

Today, the scene has changed completely across the country. Politically, the North is no longer a 'single North' after the Houthis' coup in 2014-15 to seize the capital, Sanaa (which triggered a civil war that has dragged on for a decade), nor is the South politically and socially a 'single South'. Hadramout and Al-Mahrah insist they were never part of the Federation of South Arabia, the system created by Britain's colonial era.

Imposing conditions

Today, some Hadramis—including STC supporters—say agreement to join any new southern state would be conditional on them being given the right to hold a referendum on self-determination if their experience within any new State of South Arabia proves insufficiently appealing to remain within it. Others say they should only be part of a single Yemeni state if Hadramout enjoys autonomous powers.

The governorate, which has a population of approximately one million, is confident owing to its vast size and natural resources. Yemen has proven oil reserves of approximately 3.1 billion barrels, more than 80% of which are located in the Hadramout region's Masila Basin. Hadramout also has a vital border crossing with Saudi Arabia, which supports the internationally-recognised Yemeni government, whose control of territory was upended by the STC's December action.

The Hadramout Tribal Alliance has demanded the "immediate and unconditional" withdrawal of STC forces from the Hadramout and al-Mahra governorates, accusing them of "criminal violations". It said it held the STC and its backers responsible for the flare-up of violence and pledged to act to stop attacks by "militias from outside the province".

Hadramis think that the decision by STC leader Maj. Gen. Aidarous al-Zubaidi to storm Hadramout and Al-Mahrah was a strategic mistake, both in terms of timing and target.

font change