French diplomat Sylvie Bermann: Trump won’t divide Russia and China

The experienced French envoy had front-row seats as relations between Beijing and Moscow blossomed, but as she recalls from her days studying in China: it wasn’t always so.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov meets China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Moscow on 2 December 2025. Ambassador Sylvie Bermann thinks Donald Trump will not drive a wedge between Moscow and Beijing.
AFP
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov meets China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Moscow on 2 December 2025. Ambassador Sylvie Bermann thinks Donald Trump will not drive a wedge between Moscow and Beijing.

French diplomat Sylvie Bermann: Trump won’t divide Russia and China

French diplomat Sylvie Bermann first encountered China as a young student at the twilight of the Cultural Revolution in 1976-77. Two decades later, she returned as her country’s ambassador to Beijing from 2011-14, before serving as the French envoy to London from 2014-17, and as ambassador to Moscow between 2017-19.

Trusted to manage France’s most important international relationships, Bermann came to know China across two starkly different eras, each marked by profound transformation. Her posting to Moscow coincided with mounting tensions between Russia and the West, alongside deepening ties between Moscow and Beijing. This placed her at the heart of the Russian-West confrontation and the evolving dynamics of the Sino-Russian relationship.

She distilled this wealth of experience in her latest book, titled The Bear and the Dragon: Russia–China, A History of Friendship Without Limits? It analyses relations between Beijing and Moscow, from pragmatic rapprochements to strategic confrontations, from 19th century border disputes to 20th century ideological schisms, culminating in today’s partnership forged in opposition to a shared adversary: the West.

Al Majalla recently met Ambassador Bermann, who now chairs the Board of the Higher Institute for National Defence Studies under France’s Ministry of Defence, to discuss the past, present, and future of Russia-China relations.


Do China and Russia consider each other allies or partners, given their historical relationship?

When I left China at the end of 2019, I met the director of Asian Affairs at the Russian Foreign Ministry—now Russia’s ambassador to Beijing—who told me that, thanks to Donald Trump, relations between the two countries had not been this good since the time of Catherine the Great in the 18th century. This remark highlights the fact that such friendship is far from self-evident.

Personally, I have seen a deeply troubled relationship between the two nations. Studying in China during the final years of the Cultural Revolution in 1976–77, I saw how tense things still were. The Chinese believed that the Russians—or rather, the Soviets—were preparing a nuclear strike against them. Relations were abysmal. Today, they are cordial because China and Russia share a common adversary: the US.

There is a diplomatic phrase: “The enemy of my enemy is my friend.” This is what has driven the rapprochement between them over the past 10-15 years. But this is not an alliance. China avoids formal alliances. It remembers the Sino-Soviet alliance, which ended in bloodshed along the Ussuri River after violent clashes. China now prefers flexible partnerships—circles of friends—rather than binding alliances.

The two countries share a common interest: the desire for a world not dominated by the United States or the West, in which rules are not imposed upon them from the outside. This explains their convergence. It did not begin with the war in Ukraine, but rather in 2014 during the Sochi Olympics, when Russia faced the threat of a boycott. Xi Jinping showed his support by attending openly and prominently.

What brings Beijing and Moscow together today?

This shared adversary and their determination not to submit to rules imposed by others, nor to tolerate interference in their internal affairs. They support the rise of what is now referred to as the ‘Global South.’ This was first seen with the creation of BRICS, which has since expanded to include new members, and the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, which holds regular meetings. Notably, the UN Secretary-General attends these gatherings. Participants represent most of the world’s population.

Alain Jocard / AFP
Sylvie Bermann was French ambassador to Beijing from 2011-14, to London from 2014-17, and to Moscow from 2017-19.

China and Russia also aspire to a world in which the dominance of the dollar is diminished, since this allows the US to impose extraterritorial sanctions on many states. China has thus conducted an increasing share of its trade in yuan—not only with Russia, but also with other Global South countries, such as Brazil.

What are the potential points of discord between them?

The relationship is inherently unbalanced in favour of China yet both sides find clear benefit in it. China has replaced Western nations as the principal importer of Russian oil following the imposition of sanctions. It also supplies manufacturing equipment—fitted with microchips—that can, among other uses, support Russia’s military effort. Although China has never endorsed the annexation of Crimea or the invasion of Ukraine, I do not foresee any major disputes arising between them, as the border question was definitively resolved in 2004, with the return of the final island in 2008.

Russia feels encircled by NATO and the West, which was a factor behind the war in Ukraine, while China sees itself as hemmed in by American bases and alliances with Japan, India, and Australia, as well as the Quad and AUKUS groupings.

Between Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin there is a genuine depth of understanding. At the popular level, however, the picture is different. The Chinese do not hold the Russians in high regard; the Russians, in turn, harbour little affection for the Chinese. Russians see themselves as European—contrary to what Putin now claims. They remain wary of Asians, including the Chinese, which is often shaped by longstanding prejudice. They also fear being exploited, given China’s far greater strength.

Russia feels encircled by NATO and the West, which was a factor behind the war in Ukraine, while China sees itself as hemmed in by American bases and alliances

While there is no real danger of a Chinese move into Siberia—the Chinese have no desire whatsoever to settle there—mutual suspicions persist. From the Russian side, weakness breeds unease towards the stronger partner. From the Chinese side, there is a degree of disdain, as Russia has failed where China has succeeded.

Russia once possessed advantages—factories, industries, a space programme, engineers, and mathematicians of the highest calibre—yet it faltered in its post-Soviet transition. China, by contrast, rose from almost nothing, having closed its universities for a decade, to become the world's second-largest economy—or the first by purchasing power parity—and a global leader in AI. In short, popular mistrust remains, but the two leaderships share a common interest in rapprochement. Neither will open a front of conflict against the other so long as they face competition on other fronts.

To what extent is Russia economically dependent on China?

There is a dependence born of sanctions and Russia's rentier economy, which relies heavily on the export of gas, oil, and natural resources. China, by contrast, has relatively few natural resources beyond rare earths. We therefore see a form of economic dependency, though not one that amounts to political subordination, nor does it constrain Russia's strategic choices. Some say Xi Jinping need only ask Putin to end the war and it would happen. This is entirely false. Putin has his own interests. He may listen to China to a degree, but Beijing cannot dictate his positions.

Does this dependency affect the dynamics of the bilateral relationship?

Not economically. China makes no concessions; prices are set strictly in-line with its own interests, as it holds the stronger position. Politically, however, each side acts with complete autonomy within its respective regional sphere. If China were intervene in Taiwan, it would expect Russia's support, in reciprocity for Beijing's stance over Ukraine.

It seems that US President Donald Trump wants to stop Moscow from leaning entirely towards Beijing. Does such a strategy strike you as realistic?

I do not believe the United States can separate Russia from China. Even if Trump is personally inclined towards Putin, this does not change the fact that Putin thinks long-term and knows that Washington will continue to regard Russia as an adversary. The prospect of detaching Russia from China therefore seems very slim. Trump has never explicitly said he wants to sever Russia from China, but did put forward proposals for partnership with Russia, including in rare minerals and in the Arctic, where China has ambitions. Such proposals might hinder certain Chinese projects there.

AFP
French ambassador to China Sylvie Bermann (2R) joins Chinese officials at a ceremony to inaugurate the first ever Air France flight to land in Wuhan.

I believe that Trump was captivated by Putin's persona. Guided by his art-of-the-deal approach, Trump believed he could pressure the weaker party, Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky, then offer Putin a generous deal: economic partnership, lifting of sanctions, and international rehabilitation. He assumed that Putin would accept immediately. The surprise was that he did not. Putin cares first and foremost about security, not economics. He sees Ukraine's accession to NATO as a direct threat, and NATO itself as a menace. This is why Trump's efforts failed.

I believe the idea of a grand partnership with Russia still lingers in Trump's mind, but I do not think it will succeed, at least not in the present circumstances. Trump's goal is to forge a broad partnership with Russia, a country rich in natural resources. Before the war, American companies were deeply involved there: ExxonMobil had major operations in Sakhalin, and Boeing had partnerships in Siberia's titanium valley. The Americans clearly intend to return to invest there.

Could Europe pursue the opposite course, drawing closer to China to put pressure on Moscow?

This is exceedingly difficult for Europeans today, amidst the resurgence of empires, the law of the strongest, and the rise of 'strongmen.' By contrast, Europe was built on treaties, international law, compromise, and negotiation.

If Donald Trump seeks confrontation with China and demands European support, the Europeans will find themselves in a precarious position. They must strike a balance between avoiding war with China and supporting the United States. On the other hand, it may serve European interests—particularly if they are confronted with extraterritorial American sanctions and arbitrary tariffs—to cultivate partnerships with China in certain areas, as a means of restoring strategic balance.

Has China benefited from the war in Ukraine?

It has bought Russian oil and gas at lower prices, and the conflict has helped strengthen the Global South, but China has also felt the impact of American sanctions, because some of its companies are suspected of engaging in dealings with Russia in sectors that support its military capabilities. Overall, what matters most to China is economic development. It is a wealthy nation, but poverty persists in some regions, so I do not believe that China has truly benefited from this war.

Even politically, to reinforce the alliance…?

Alliance? No. It was already strong before the war. It is true that it has been reinforced, but this is a long-standing partnership. China is often accused of being in Russia's camp—sometimes even labelled as part of an "axis of evil" in simplistic moral terms—and I believe this rhetoric irritates Beijing.

Is the Sino-Russian relationship in Central Asia complementary, with Russia handling security and China funding economic development?

Yes, that is the prevailing dynamic. Russia has strong political influence there because the region was once part of the Soviet Union. This may not last indefinitely, but China, with its far greater financial resources, has become the dominant economic actor. There is a balance between politics and economics. Indeed, at the outset of the war in Ukraine in 2022, as Russia appeared weakened, Central Asian states to deepen ties with China. For example, Beijing publicly affirmed its support for Kazakhstan, effectively signalling a guarantee of its independence from Russia.

Could the rapprochement between Russia and North Korea cause tensions for Beijing?

Yes. Historically, Beijing was North Korea's sole patron. During the Korean War, the Soviets did not intervene to defend the North. Stalin told Kim Il-sung: "If you face problems, go to Mao. Do not come to me." The Soviets had no interest in confronting another nuclear power. It was China that protected North Korea and ensured the regime's survival for decades, remaining its only sponsor.

Alexander Nemenov / AFP
France's ambassador to Russia Sylvie Bermann takes part in a wreath laying ceremony at a monument to France's WWII Normandie-Niemen flight squadron in Moscow on 8 May 2018.

In 2024, Putin visited North Korea, driven by the war in Ukraine and his need for missiles and manpower. It marked a rapprochement. More significantly, Russia concluded a genuine alliance with Pyongyang through a mutual defence pact. I suspect that China was not pleased, although it made no public statement.

In September, for the commemoration of victory over Japan, Kim Jong-Un appeared alongside Putin and Xi Jinping in China. During Putin's earlier visit to China, he wished to stop in Pyongyang before returning to Moscow, but Beijing asked that he not travel directly from Beijing to North Korea, to avoid the impression of a tripartite alliance.

Finally, are borders between China and Russia a sensitive issue in their relationship?

Russia took advantage of the weakness of the Manchu empire between the 17th and early 20th centuries to seize one million square kilometres in the Pacific region, most notably the city of Vladivostok. Today, Putin hosts an annual economic forum in Vladivostok to attract investment from the likes of China. There are no genuine Chinese claims to these territories. Vladivostok is a city that is profoundly Russian in character.

I have visited the Russian Far East frequently—Vladivostok, Khabarovsk, Birobidzhan, Sakhalin, Kamchatka. I always asked about concerns over the Chinese. Everyone told me that there was no anxiety. Indeed, the number of Chinese residents is falling. Chinese markets once thrived in the region due to differences in purchasing power, when Chinese wages were higher and cross-border trade was profitable. That is no longer the case. As I mentioned earlier, border negotiations between the two countries took place from 1994 to 2004. Today, the matter is fully settled.

font change