War with Iran likely regardless of who leads Israel

There is already speculation that there could be renewed military action against Iran involving Israel and the US once next week’s midterm elections are out of the way

War with Iran likely regardless of who leads Israel

No matter who eventually emerges victorious from Israel’s deadlocked general election result, the likelihood that the next prime minister will make any material difference to Israel’s approach to the wider Middle East appears exceedingly remote.

While Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has undoubtedly suffered a serious setback after this week’s general election, which saw his right-wing bloc fail to secure enough seats to form a majority in the 120-seat Knesset, history has shown his ability to cling to power.

With more than 90% of the votes counted, Netanyahu’s Likud party remains the largest group in the Israeli parliament with 26 seats, a six seat drop from the 32 it won in 2022. The opposition Yashar Party headed by Netanyahu’s main rival for the leadership, Gadi Eisenkot, has so far won 21 seats.

As negotiations begin over forming the next Israeli government, the key calculation will be which of these parties can form a coalition with enough seats to achieve a working majority in the next Knesset. Both leaders have said they will try to form a governing coalition.

The election result has undoubtedly proved a setback for the right-wing bloc that supported Netanyahu’s previous administration. Apart from Likud, the coalition included two ultra-Orthodox parties and two far-right parties aligned with the West Bank settler movement. The election left the coalition without the majority it had won in the 2022 election. Compared with the 64 seats it won four years ago, the group won only 53 in this week’s election, a dramatic turnaround in the coalition’s fortunes.

As a result, opposition parties now collectively command a majority of parliament seats, rising from 56 in the last election to 67 in the current one, thereby giving them—on paper, at least—a working majority in the Knesset. But unlike the right-wing bloc, they have yet to agree on an overall strategy for forming a coalition government.

There are indications that Netanyahu is willing to renew hostilities against Iran even as negotiations take place over the formation of the next Israeli government

One key factor that could shape the next Israeli government is the strong performance of the Arab-led parties, which are on course to win an unprecedented 19 seats. This raises the possibility that they could ultimately emerge as kingmakers, even though all but one of the Jewish parties have pledged not to work with them.

Once the final results are confirmed, Israeli President Isaac Herzog will hold consultations with all the political factions and invite the leader whom he believes has the best chance of success to form a government—a process that could take weeks. 

Iran action likely

In the meantime, the 77-year-old Netanyahu will remain in charge, and there is already speculation that there could be renewed military action against Iran involving Israel and the US once next week's midterm elections are out of the way.

One of Netanyahu's key campaign promises during the election was to fulfil his threat to topple the Iranian regime, and there are indications that the Israeli premier is willing to renew hostilities against Tehran even as negotiations take place over the formation of the next Israeli government.

According to US media reports, the US and Israel are preparing plans for a possible attack on Iran in early November. An official with knowledge of the plans told the American NPR network that Netanyahu had initially planned to strike Iran in mid-October, about two weeks before Israeli elections on 27 October. But the military strikes were called off after US President Donald Trump, who is battling to avoid a serious political setback in next week's midterm elections, raised strong objections to the move.

The reports are certainly being taken seriously in Iran, with Iranian state media quoting a security source saying that if Iranian officials or civilian infrastructure were attacked, Iran would retaliate by targeting US interests in the region, as well as the infrastructure and assets of countries participating in the war. 

The prospect of Israel scaling back its combative stance towards Iran if Eisenkot succeeds in his bid to replace Netanyahu as prime minister is slim

Just as hawkish

Nor is there any prospect of Israel scaling down its combative stance towards Iran in the event that Eisenkot succeeds in his bid to replace Netanyahu as prime minister. As the former head of the Israeli army, as well as serving in Netanyahu's war cabinet at the start of the Gaza conflict, the 66-year-old Eisenkot is widely regarded as a hawk on national security issues, whether it involves Israeli army operations against Iran, Hamas or Hezbollah.

Since the October 7 attacks in 2023, he has broadly supported Netanyahu's decision to launch military operations against Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in southern Lebanon. On Iran, he shares Netanyahu's central goals of preventing it from acquiring a nuclear weapon and of weakening Tehran's proxy network.

Eisenkot's determination to confront Israel's regional foes has been strengthened after his youngest son, Gal, 25, was killed fighting in Gaza in December 2023, two months into the war. Two of his nephews died in combat as well. "Over Gal's grave, I swore that the price he paid, he and his friends, those he knew and those he didn't, would not be in vain," Eisenkot wrote in the newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth in April 2026. 

The only significant difference between Eisenkot and Netanyahu in terms of Israel's approach to security issues is that Eisenkot believes that it is just as important to pursue diplomatic options to resolve conflicts, while Netanyahu's attitude appears to favour relying on overwhelming military force to achieve his aims, an approach that has so far failed to achieve the desired outcome for Israel in the recent conflicts involving Iran, Gaza and southern Lebanon.

Despite these differences, both Netanyahu and Eisenkot are keen to promote their credentials as wartime leaders, an attitude that does not bode well for the future prospects of peace in the Middle East.  

font change