Power and monotheism from Rome to the East

In modern Arab history, there have been widely different views on the role of religion in governance. Western history offers valuable lessons on which model works best.

Power and monotheism from Rome to the East

In the West, the role of religion in power has evolved over time. From the fall of the Roman Empire and the Byzantine Empire's embrace of Christianity under Emperor Constantine to the rise of the Holy Roman Empire in the Middle Ages and the Reformation movement led by Martin Luther, these transitions were fraught with protracted periods of warfare where religion and dynastic-political interests were inextricably linked.

Constantine’s conversion to Christianity in the third century AD came at a time when the Roman Empire was experiencing economic and social upheaval, civil wars, power struggles, invasions by Germanic tribes, and the rise of Diocletian. Therefore, the empire felt compelled to shift its capital eastward to Constantinople, designating it the seat of the Eastern Empire.

Emperor Constantine understood the link between polytheism and polyarchy and found that the monotheism of Christianity provided a framework to concentrate power in a single political figure, the Roman Emperor, who could rule unchallenged—not as a man elected by his peers but as a divine leader chosen by heaven. Pagan thinkers of the time argued that the unification of the gods reinforced despotism.

When the Holy Roman Empire arose in the West following the coronation of Charlemagne by the Pope, the Byzantines saw it as an attempt to shatter their exclusive hold on divine kingship, further widening the divide with the Roman Church—a rift that would culminate in the complete schism between the Eastern and Western churches.

Choosing the right govening model in Levant countries requires careful consideration given their diverse religious, sectarian, ethnic and social fabrics

Byzantium continued to identify itself as the Roman state until the fall of Constantinople to Mehmed the Conqueror, who was bestowed the title of "Sultan of the Romans."

Later, the Protestant Reformation challenged the doctrine of the divine right to rule in the West, which was further solidified by Cromwell's revolution in Britain and, later, the French Revolution. Meanwhile, in the East, the Ottoman Sultan assumed the title of Caliph following the death of the last Abbasid Caliph, Al-Mutawakkil III, in 1543 (though the accuracy of this account remains contested). The title enabled the Ottoman ruler to consolidate both religious and political authority—an arrangement that endured until Mustafa Kemal Atatürk abolished the caliphate.

Read more: This day in history: Turkey abolishes the Caliphate 

Since then, different governing models have emerged across the Arab and Islamic worlds—from attempts to revive the caliphate (notably among members of Egypt's ruling family), to the adoption of a republican model with military backing (as seen in Türkiye), to efforts at modernisation under the Shah's rule (such as Iran under Reza Shah). 

Fast forward to today, Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq are searching for a governing model that can rescue them from decades of political turmoil and war. Choosing the right one requires careful consideration given their diverse religious, sectarian, ethnic and social fabrics. Western history offers valuable lessons on which model works best.

font change