Palestinians pay steep price as Hamas pursues unlikely victory

For many observers, the only semblance of victory is seen in the resilience of the Palestinians of Gaza themselves as they are left to bear the brunt of the war alone

An injured Palestinian mother and daughter hug each other after surviving Israeli bombardment of Gaza in October 2023.
AFP
An injured Palestinian mother and daughter hug each other after surviving Israeli bombardment of Gaza in October 2023.

Palestinians pay steep price as Hamas pursues unlikely victory

In the Middle East, the drums of war are often beaten to distract populations from domestic unrest and concerns. Enemies are identified as a looming threat, and leaders vow to confront this threat.

However, when war is waged to achieve political objectives or to distract from domestic failures, it almost always ends up backfiring by simply fomenting more chaos, resulting in the loss of life and the wasting of resources.

One example of such a war is the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s. At the time, Saddam Hussein's regime vowed to fight against "Persian expansion into the Arab homeland". On its part, Iranians rallied behind the slogan, "The path to liberate Jerusalem starts from Karbala."

After exhausting Iraq's resources and manpower during the eight-year war, Saddam went on to invade its southern neighbour Kuwait in 1990, destabilising the security of the entire Gulf region.

This demonstrates the dangers of how countries subservient to the whims of their political leaders, who are not interested in pursuing peaceful solutions, can fall into the trap of war.

This example demonstrates how it is much harder to pursue peace than to wage war, and the recent example of Israel's war on Gaza proves just that.

Palestinians fleeing north Gaza move southward as ambulances head towards north Gaza during a temporary truce between Israel and Hamas, near Gaza City, November 27, 2023.

Religion used to fuel extremism

Religion is often used as an effective tool to fuel extremism and wage wars, with countless examples spanning human history.

Samuel Huntington's famous book The Clash of Civilisations –which began as a magazine article written as the Cold War was ending – predicted that future wars would be fought between cultures rather than countries. Many observers view the rise of extremist religious ideologies in the past few decades as validation of Huntington's thesis.

The Hamas-led Al-Aqsa Flood operation and Israel’s subsequent brutal military campaign in the Gaza Strip have reignited discourse among extremists openly espousing genocidal rhetoric.

Several leaders in the United States and Europe have expressed solidarity with Israel and have conflated criticism against Israel's war with anti-Semitism.

Despite massive and widespread protests against Israel's war crimes, attempts by government and media personalities to discredit and silence them have been relentless.

Despite massive and widespread protests against Israel's war crimes, attempts by government and media personalities to discredit and silence them have been relentless.

Extremist tactics 

Prominent Iranian philosopher Mostafa Malekian has identified three tactics employed by extremists to advance their agenda.

The first tactic is to label anyone who disagrees with extremists' perspective as the enemy. This is used to silence critics who may hold differing views.

The second tactic is to blame the victim for their poor situation to deflect from the aggressor's responsibility for said situation.

The third tactic is to portray any aggression taken against the enemy as virtuous and righteous.

Since the 1967 war, Arab intellectuals have debated the practicality of achieving victory through war. The overwhelming conclusion reached was that war should not based on empty slogans and driven by emotions — it needs detailed and forward planning.

This is particularly difficult to do when societies are governed by dictators who purposely strive to keep their citizens uneducated and ignorant. 

Cultural, political, and educated elites have spoken out about the detrimental impact of war on societies, but these voices have not been powerful enough to impact the masses.

The saying goes: history is written by the victors. As such, the atrocities of war – including genocide, ethnic cleansing, and mass destruction – are more often commemorated than condemned, primarily because superpowers are rarely held accountable.

The saying goes: history is written by the victors. As such, war crimes are more often commemorated than condemned, primarily because superpowers are rarely held accountable.

Steep-price for an unlikely victory

Seven weeks of Israel's bombardment of Gaza and the total cut off of food, electricity and fuel has resulted in more than 15,000 Palestinians killed and over 33,000 wounded.

AFP
A Palestinian woman mourns the loss of her family members after Israeli bombardment of Gaza in October 2023.

As such, Palestinians in Gaza — mourning the killing of their loved ones and still trying to pull their bodies out from under the rubble of their bombed homes — do not seem to be convinced of Hamas's declaration of military success in its 7 October operation.

For many observers, the only semblance of victory is seen in the resilience of the Palestinians of Gaza themselves. But what purpose does such sentiment hold if Palestinians are left to bear the brunt of the war alone? 

Their sympathy means little to Palestinians, who see their historical cause being continuously exploited to further different political agendas in the Arab world.

Currently, the two-state solution is being floated in an attempt to de-escalate the situation or as a potential path to a permanent ceasefire and the end of the Israeli military assault.

But ss a two-state solution worth pursuing if that comes at an astronomical human and material cost? Or if it means the potential elimination of Hamas and reconfiguration of Gaza's geopolitical landscape? 

Embracing the two-state solution and engaging in negotiations with a government led by Benjamin Netanyahu implies implicit support for his objective: the eradication of the Hamas movement — the group that controls Gaza.

Netanyahu's barbaric bombing of Gaza is motivated in part to shift some of the blame for 7 October away from Israel's intelligence failure, as well as to discourage any fighter groups, whether in Palestine or neighbouring countries, from similar militant operations in the future.

At this juncture, Hamas has some difficult decisions to make.

It can either continue the confrontation, realising that it is fighting alone without much military or financial support, or it can opt for a political solution to end the war via negotiations, which could effectively lead to their expulsion.

font change

Related Articles