The IEA: A champion of sustainable errors

The West’s energy watchdog has been barking up the wrong tree and Opec has already stopped following its forecasts

The IEA: A champion of sustainable errors

“There is an organisation called the International Energy Agency; I think it has proven that it takes a really special talent to be consistently wrong.” – Saudi Energy Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman.

These words came during a discussion on global energy supplies at the Qatar Economic Forum last week. They form a clear opinion on the quality of the forecasts, studies, and statements issued by the IEA, and also act as a kind of warning.

The statement also comes 13 months after Opec officially decided to stop using the IEA’s oil production data in its assessment of oil markets.

Prince Abdulaziz’s words put the world on alert over the IEA’s forecasts, which have triggered volatility in oil markets and provided a deterrent from upstream investments in the industry, potentially undermining future supply and the ability to meet growing global energy demand.

Price fluctuations in 2022 and the uncertainty in the energy markets were influenced by IEA studies and forecasts, which have called for the cessation of oil and gas investments.

The organisation, sometimes referred to as the West’s energy watchdog, turned a blind eye to the impact of monetary policies on energy markets including oil, as well as the dumping caused by quantitative easing during the height of the Covid-19 pandemic.

There were clear reasons behind Opec’s decision to drop the IEA’s production data in April 2022 as one of its secondary sources for tracking output. It came too late for some, after two years of contractions in studies that increasingly looked biased and inaccurate.

Whatever else, relations between the IEA, the oil consumers’ body, and Opec, the producer’s group, deteriorated because of climate policies. In particular, the IEA’s roadmap to reach zero carbon emissions by 2050 and its call for an immediate halt to upstream oil and gas investment would have catastrophic consequences for the global economy and energy security.

Read more: How Saudi Arabia is building a realistic roadmap for a circular carbon economy

That call followed earlier contradictory reports and statements and misleading forecasts which have ongoing negative effects on the future of global energy supply. Opec’s joint technical committee should have excluded the IEA from its thinking earlier.

The IEA call for an immediate halt to upstream oil and gas investment followed earlier contradictory reports and statements and misleading forecasts which have ongoing negative effects on the future of global energy supply. Opec's joint technical committee should have excluded the IEA from its thinking earlier.

The Saudi energy minister's words can also serve as advice for speculators in the futures markets who may forget that there is also a real-world component of the oil market, with prices driven by clearer conditions, known as fundamentals.

Here, it is in no one's interest for the market to collapse as it did in April 2020, when the price of West Texas Intermediate crude crossed into negative levels.

There's no objection to futures traders making profits. But there should be due respect for market fundamentals because we all live in one world where all economies are affected when oil markets are shaken.

Physical v futures markets

In physical commodities markets, oil is sold in measurements known as barrels to refineries for immediate delivery and subsequent processing into the fuels on which the world depends.

Futures markets are different. There, bets on prices on specific dates are made by speculators, which can be a useful tool to hedge risk in terms of exposure to prices.

Futures prices are determined by the supply and demand, not of oil itself, but by the volume in trading of futures positions. This means this part of the market can be sensitive to forecasts and speculation.

Over the past weeks, there has been a significant decline in the purchase of futures on the Nymex platform: transactions fell to less than 400,000 contracts amid fears of economic recession. This prompted hedge funds and money managers to liquidate their oil positions at one of the fastest paces in the past three years.

Over the past weeks, there has been a significant decline in the purchase of futures amid fears of economic recession. This prompted hedge funds and money managers to liquidate their oil positions at one of the fastest paces in the past three years.

Futures contracts covering more than 200 million barrels of oil were sold as fears over the economy took hold at the sharpest pace since April 2020,  when worries about the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic took WTI futures prices negative.

That unusual move came in defiance of tighter conditions in the physical market, mainly influenced by fears about the impact on demand of the economic slowdown. A tightening of supplies in the physical market, which would usually support prices, came as futures continued to fall.

Stocks of oil in OECD countries, a club of richer nations, were lower at the time, by about 253 million barrels year-on-year and about 312 million barrels under the five-year average.

The latest OECD commercial oil inventories data in March 2023 show 195 million barrels, which is higher compared to the same time a year ago. Interestingly, this figure is nearly close to the 200 million barrels that were withdrawn last year from US strategic stocks, according to data from the US Energy Information Administration.

Futures trading has an important role, including acting as a mechanism to price wider factors that may show through on energy markets and wider financial exchanges, such as rising interest rates or the potential turbulence recently over the US debt ceiling.

But it should not run too far from the real-world factors of supply and demand that drive the fundamental part of an energy market that keeps the global economy moving.

font change