“There is an organisation called the International Energy Agency; I think it has proven that it takes a really special talent to be consistently wrong.” – Saudi Energy Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman.
These words came during a discussion on global energy supplies at the Qatar Economic Forum last week. They form a clear opinion on the quality of the forecasts, studies, and statements issued by the IEA, and also act as a kind of warning.
The statement also comes 13 months after Opec officially decided to stop using the IEA’s oil production data in its assessment of oil markets.
Prince Abdulaziz’s words put the world on alert over the IEA’s forecasts, which have triggered volatility in oil markets and provided a deterrent from upstream investments in the industry, potentially undermining future supply and the ability to meet growing global energy demand.
Price fluctuations in 2022 and the uncertainty in the energy markets were influenced by IEA studies and forecasts, which have called for the cessation of oil and gas investments.
The organisation, sometimes referred to as the West’s energy watchdog, turned a blind eye to the impact of monetary policies on energy markets including oil, as well as the dumping caused by quantitative easing during the height of the Covid-19 pandemic.
There were clear reasons behind Opec’s decision to drop the IEA’s production data in April 2022 as one of its secondary sources for tracking output. It came too late for some, after two years of contractions in studies that increasingly looked biased and inaccurate.
Whatever else, relations between the IEA, the oil consumers’ body, and Opec, the producer’s group, deteriorated because of climate policies. In particular, the IEA’s roadmap to reach zero carbon emissions by 2050 and its call for an immediate halt to upstream oil and gas investment would have catastrophic consequences for the global economy and energy security.
Read more: How Saudi Arabia is building a realistic roadmap for a circular carbon economy
That call followed earlier contradictory reports and statements and misleading forecasts which have ongoing negative effects on the future of global energy supply. Opec’s joint technical committee should have excluded the IEA from its thinking earlier.