Mamdani recognised the Nakba. It's time Israel does the same.

The New York City mayor's statement likely resonated with the growing number of Israelis who think that recognising the Nakba is an important first step toward reconciliation.

Mamdani recognised the Nakba. It's time Israel does the same.

“Today marks Nakba Day, an annual day of remembrance to commemorate the expulsion of more than 700,000 Palestinians between 1947 and 1949 during the creation of the State of Israel and the year that followed.”

On 15 May this month, NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani shared the above statement on social media, potentially making it one of the most widely circulated accounts of the Nakba by an American politician. For Palestinians, this was likely a relief, as their suffering has largely been ignored on the US political scene. With one post, the Nakba transformed from a mere chant at pro-Palestine protests into a familiar term in American households. A survivor’s testimony shared with the post gave public expression to long-suppressed grief.

Not surprisingly, Jewish and pro-Israeli groups quickly criticised Mamdani, making the claim that it was one-sided. However, these groups should take note: less than a month ago, Mamdani also outraged Turkish Americans when he recognised the 111th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide. He commemorated the “1.5 million Armenians murdered by the Ottoman Empire,” and criticised Azerbaijan and Türkiye for “continuing the genocidal campaign that had begun over 100 years prior” through attacks on the Armenian population of Nagorno-Karabakh.

Taken together, these statements suggest that Mamdani is motivated by a genuine desire to give voice to oppressed communities and their silenced histories. Sadly, in the polarised climate following October 7, nearly every discussion of Israel and Palestine is framed as an either/or choice, turning the conflict into a zero-sum moral contest.

But even in this binary environment, Mamdani’s statement likely resonated with the growing number of Israelis who think that recognising the Nakba is an important first step toward reconciliation.

Under Netanyahu, Israel rapidly shifted from an open society to one shaped by Nakba laws and nation-state legislation

As an Israeli, I first encountered the Nakba while studying at Haifa University in the early 1990s. During that period, Israeli scholars, known as the New Historians, conducted groundbreaking research. Benny Morris documented the destruction of more than 400 villages; Ilan Pappe discussed the Nakba; and other scholars, both Palestinian and Israeli, sought to reconcile their histories. Back then, the Nakba was a topic of public debate even on Israeli TV, where nationalist narratives were challenged.

We did not anticipate the failure of the peace process, the division caused by walls separating Jews and Palestinians, the Second Intifada, and finally, a Netanyahu government after 2009 that has institutionalised the denial of the Nakba for over 15 years—similar to Türkiye's long denial of the Armenian Genocide. As a result, efforts towards recognition were met with rejection, demonstrating how historical progress can rapidly regress. Frustratingly, far-right claims that deny Palestinians a peoplehood have even gained traction during the past decade or so.   

Under Netanyahu, Israel rapidly shifted from an open society to one shaped by Nakba laws and nation-state legislation. This transformation casts groups like Zochrot, which documents the Nakba, and B'Tselem, a human rights organisation, as traitors. As Israel moved toward a government attempting to curb public dissent, the effects of Netanyahu's leadership became more evident. TV stations followed suit, and the purge of leftist voices was in full swing. If the Palestinian flag was torn from the hands of protesters, with no legal basis, what would be next? 

Despite government pressure, Israel's civil society has seen growing support for reconciliation efforts in recent years. Organisations such as Combatants for Peace, comprising Israelis and Palestinians—both of whom have lost relatives to the conflict—meet to foster solidarity and peace. Rather than Israelis commemorating their soldiers only on Memorial Day, they observe it jointly with Palestinians who have lost their children. For over 7 years, a shared Nakba remembrance ceremony has been organised by Palestinians in the West Bank.

Standing Together is an initiative bringing Palestinians with Israeli citizenship and Israeli Jews together through protests to demonstrate their refusal to be enemies. Besides organising protests, they send teams to the West Bank as a "protective presence" to help curb settler violence.

Under Netanyahu, groups like Zochrot, which documents the Nakba, and B'Tselem, a human rights organisation, as traitors.

On Jerusalem Day, they wear purple vests to help defuse tensions and respond to attacks on Jerusalem's Palestinian residents, using their bodies to de-escalate violence while Israeli police watch. As observed last week during Jerusalem Day, their numbers are increasing.

These groups are growing considerably; even if Israeli media largely ignore them, their expressions of solidarity with Palestinians reach hundreds of thousands in Israel. These Israelis, acknowledging the Nakba as a historical event, do not claim sole responsibility for the century-long conflict, which has involved massacres on both sides. Nonetheless, the Nakba—the mass displacement and dispossession of Palestinians—occurred as a direct result of the establishment of the Jewish state.

Since the Nakba can barely be acknowledged in Israel, Mamdani is justified in openly recognising it here. Nonetheless, if Mamdani aims to promote change, he should acknowledge the progressive movements within Israel, since these voices need to be heard louder than ever.

True, he already took a step toward this by participating in an Israeli peace vigil on October 7 as a mayoral candidate, but providing an open forum for dialogue can show how sincerely he is committed to fostering strong relations in New York that radiate back to Israel and Palestine. 

Finally, as New York's mayor, Mamdani must remain resolute against antisemitism, especially by ensuring that pro-Palestinian protests do not devolve into intimidation, as seen in Brooklyn last week. New York must avoid becoming another London, where Jewish communities have faced growing fear and insecurity amid attacks. If Mamdani handles this wisely, he can not only improve the city but also foster progressive change across the US and beyond.

font change