Farewell, David Lynch: A tribute to cinema’s last great surrealist

The American director pushed cinematic experimentation to its limits and, in so doing, created deep connections with many of his viewers

US director David Lynch poses after receiving a lifetime achievement award during the 12th Rome Film Festival on November 4, 2017, in Rome.
TIZIANA FABI / AFP
US director David Lynch poses after receiving a lifetime achievement award during the 12th Rome Film Festival on November 4, 2017, in Rome.

Farewell, David Lynch: A tribute to cinema’s last great surrealist

Just days after devastating fires swept through homes and film studios in Los Angeles, Hollywood suffered another blow with the passing of one of its most innovative and audacious filmmakers: David Lynch.

Years of heavy smoking followed by emphysema had made his health fragile. Having to evacuate as flames threatened his home may have hastened the deterioration. Those who loved his work may well have imagined his end in Lynchian cinematic fashion: a black-and-white, his eyes melancholic yet tender, smoking slowly until he is consumed.

The daring director, who was 78, was mourned by cinephiles, critics, filmmakers, and Hollywood royalty alike, but what really stood out were the heartfelt tributes from ordinary viewers, who expressed their sorrow with simplicity and sincerity, free from pretension or complexity.

Social media was filled with mentions of “the death of the creator of Mulholland Drive” while others celebrated his remarkable and distinctive contribution to television through the iconic series Twin Peaks, which ran throughout much of the 1990s.

On YouTube, fans of his short films grieved. Many shared their personal connections to his work and spoke of its meditative quality, recounting how an initial sense of fear gradually gave way to familiarity and comfort over time. What made him resonate so deeply with audiences? Lynch was not easily understood.

Rejecting convention

He did not create cinema that was easy to digest, and in his later years, he all but retreated from the spotlight, avoiding even discussions of potential new projects. Instead, he focused on crafting non-commercial short films purely for his own satisfaction, with no intention of courting attention.

This way, he found the freedom to think—or rather, to dream. For him, cinema was not a structured narrative with a clear beginning, middle, and end, but rather a dream or nightmare. His films were full of experimental storytelling, surreal dreams, and introspective monologues. It defied traditional Hollywood storytelling conventions.

Lynch’s artistry lay in drawing viewers into his reveries and the internal dialogues of himself and of his characters, creating works that ultimately became as much a part of the audience’s experience as his own, igniting shared emotions, fantasies, or delusions.

David Lynch’s films comprise fragmented scenes that many have sought to piece together into a cohesive narrative, yet beyond this, his films also provide a deeply visual pleasure, returning cinema to its core sense: the sense of sight. He knew that the eye creates its own vision of films—not the mind.

Solace and perspective

Sight was central to the surrealist foundational short film Un Chien Andalou (1929) by Luis Buñuel, a work that influenced Lynch’s debut feature Eraserhead (1977) and, to some extent, his second film The Elephant Man (1980), which presents as a straightforward black-and-white narrative about a real-life figure, John Merrick.

Physically deformed, Merrick is exploited and mistreated by society until Dr Frederick Treves (portrayed by Anthony Hopkins) discovers him and offers him one last chance to live with dignity.

The Elephant Man has spiritual, human, and even cosmic dimensions, particularly in its final scenes, where Lynch seeks to provide solace—or an elevated perspective—on Merrick's harrowing life, linking his death to the cycles of the cosmos. In Lynch's later works, however, any final explanation or conclusion is often absent.

Lynch's works include ten feature films, a series, and numerous short films. Throughout them all, there is his profound sensitivity to the fragility of the human condition and humanity's awareness of its own vulnerability. This fragility is often the driver of violence, betrayal, and manipulation.

Lynch made non-commercial short films purely for his own satisfaction. In them, he found the freedom to dream.

Inhabiting a hinterland

In a David Lynch film, it is not uncommon to see people crying with a distinct lack of cinematic refinement but rather screams and sobs that are both raw and unfiltered as the character wrestles with unrelenting, life-consuming, existential pain. In Mulholland Drive (2001), Diane (played by Naomi Watts) endures Camille's betrayal alone in her apartment, punishing herself over desires that are no longer attainable.

Lynch's films make ample use of the subconscious and that hinterland between sleep and wakefulness, whether this be in dreams, nightmares, delirium, anxiety, or obsession. Sometimes, this fragility breaks into reality, asserting itself in tangible ways. 

In Blue Velvet (1986), the protagonist wanders aimlessly through a grassy field and stumbles upon a severed ear crawling with ants. He places the ear in a paper envelope and takes it to the police, setting a murder investigation in motion. In this moment, human existence is distilled into a decaying, severed ear.

It is a stark departure from the poetic symbolism of Van Gogh, who famously cut off his ear and gifted it to his lover. The fate of Van Gogh's ear remains a mystery, but Lynch's ear finds its place in a grim, grounded reality. 

Explanation and purpose

Among Lynch's more notable short films is Rabbits (2002), featuring Naomi Watts and Laura Harring. Reflecting Samuel Beckett's theatrical style, it is shot with a fixed camera angle and depicts a stage occupied by three human-like rabbits, played by two women and one man. 

Persistent background music creates an apocalyptic mood, while the dialogue is entirely random, addressing topics such as time, weather, the sound of rain, and a mysterious incident. These conversations are punctuated by inexplicable bursts of audience laughter at lines that are seemingly devoid of humour.

Rabbits is one of Lynch's most-viewed short films on YouTube. Despite its absurdity, viewers keep trying to construct the story, rearranging dialogue and inferring purpose to this 45-minute surreal sequence. 

As viewers, we identify with these fragile, fearful rabbits, and in his final feature film, Inland Empire (2006), rabbits and a laughing audience make another appearance, Lynch weaving them into the surreal world that consumes Nikki (played by Laura Dern), where the actress-character boundary dissolves. 

At nearly three hours, this is Lynch's longest film and is considered by some critics to be his most significant cinematic masterpiece, one that distils nearly all his previous works and represents his most unrestrained cinematic exploration. In most Lynch films, the boundaries between delirium, inner turmoil, and the tangible world often blur. 

Pushing the boundaries

In Inland Empire, he presents a rare visual journey, putting his favourite actress (Dern) through a series of extraordinary trials and transformations within the corridors of his nightmarish universe. This sheer intensity may have led Lynch to sit next to a cow outside the American Film Academy, advocating for her nomination for Best Actress. 

So, what makes Lynch so deeply connected to us? At first glance, Mulholland Drive might not have appeared destined for widespread success, with a narrative structured like a riddle that does not require a solution, a same-sex romance, and a mental breakdown that obliterates all emotions and questions about memory and the past. 

Yet does Diane's emotional heartbreak—one of the film's few certainties, with its harrowing psychological consequences—not echo the cruel and unjust challenges we often endure without fault? Does her raw, howling pain not mirror the defeats we quietly endure in isolation, hidden from the world?

Hollywood convention includes narratives of heroes or all-powerful characters. David Lynch never conformed to that. Even in Mulholland Drive, he subtly critiques the artificiality that pushes Diane into madness and leads to Camilla's tragic end. 

Hollywood convention includes narratives of heroes or all-powerful characters. David Lynch never conformed to that

On keeping control

Lynch was, in many ways, the Hollywood antithesis—and perhaps the most authentic, so his gradual retreat from commercial cinema in recent years is neither surprising nor out-of-place with his artistic philosophy. 

In an interview with Laurent Tirard, translated by Mohsen Weifi in the book Moviemakers' Master Class: Private Lessons from the World's Foremost Directors, Lynch offered advice to aspiring filmmakers. "Always maintain control over your film from start to finish," he said. 

"It's better not to make a film at all than to relinquish the final decision-making power. If you do, you'll suffer immensely. I speak from experience. I directed Dune without overseeing the final cut, and the result nearly broke me. It kept me away from filmmaking for three years before I could direct again. I haven't been able to fully move past it—it's a wound that never heals." For many of his fans, his loss will feel similar.

font change

Related Articles